Frusi Water Treatment Plant water quality
Fort Riley, KS · serves 35,784 people (5,900 connections) · Groundwater · Federal · EPA ID KS2006114
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Summary
PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.
Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.
- PFAS
- Above limitPFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, the PFAS Hazard Index above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 14.1 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 4.4 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFHxS 18.8 ppt vs a limit of 10 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
- Lithium
- Above screening levelHighest result 30.9 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
- Lead
- Below action level1.2 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2023. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- Resolved3 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jan 2019.
- Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
- To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read Frusi Water Treatment Plant's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (785) 802-7018. EPA: how to find it.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Sep 2023 to Mar 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 14.1 ppt 3.52× the limit |
| PFOS Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 4.4 ppt 1.1× the limit |
| PFHxS Above limit Limit 10 ppt | 18.8 ppt 1.88× the limit |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Above limit Limit 1 | 1.88 |
| PFBS Detected, below limit Guideline 2,000 ppt | 6.45 ppt |
| PFBA Not detected Guideline 6,000 ppt | – |
| PFHxA Detected, below limit Guideline 3,000 ppt | 7.15 ppt |
| PFPeA Detected, no limit | 11.4 ppt |
| PFPeS Detected, no limit | 4.3 ppt |
For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 99% of the Kansas systems EPA tested, the PFOS average is higher than at 97% of the Kansas systems EPA tested and the PFHxS average is higher than at 98% of the Kansas systems EPA tested.
29 PFAS tested, 7 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Detected in 2 of 2 samples. Highest result 30.9 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 1.2 ppb lead (Jan 2021 – Dec 2023). Below action level
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jan 2021 – Dec 2023 | 1.2 ppb |
| Jan 2018 – Dec 2020 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2015 – Dec 2017 | 0 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jan 2012 – Dec 2014 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2009 – Dec 2011 | 1.1 ppb |
| Jan 2008 – Dec 2010 | 1.3 ppb |
| Jan 2005 – Dec 2007 | 3.9 ppb |
| Jan 1999 – Dec 2001 | 2.1 ppb |
| Jan 1998 – Dec 1998 | 2.4 ppb |
| Jan 1995 – Dec 1995 | 1.1 ppb |
| Jan 1994 – Dec 1994 | 3.4 ppb |
| Jan 1993 – Jun 1993 | 3 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
| When | What happened |
|---|---|
| Jul 2018 – Jan 2019 3 times | The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit. EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.084 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L) Resolved |
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)
| Contaminant | Highest | Guideline |
|---|---|---|
| Manganese | 157 ppb | 300 ppb |
| Vanadium | 1.9 ppb | 21 ppb |
| Chromium-6 | 3 ppb | – |
| Strontium | 0.49 ppm | 1.5 ppm |
| Chlorate | 346 ppb | 210 ppb |
| Molybdenum | 4.7 ppb | 40 ppb |
Where it serves
Fort Riley
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 66442
Nearby utilities
- City of Manhattan Manhattan · 12 mi
- City of Topeka Topeka · 60 mi
- City of Lawrence Lawrence · 84 mi
- City of Wichita Wichita · 102 mi
- City of Olathe Olathe · 108 mi
- Kansas City Board of Public Utilities Kansas City · 111 mi
Questions
Is Frusi Water Treatment Plant water safe to drink?
Frusi Water Treatment Plant had 3 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does Frusi Water Treatment Plant water have PFAS?
Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Frusi Water Treatment Plant found 7 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS and PFHxS: PFOA 14.1 ppt, PFOS 4.4 ppt, PFHxS 18.8 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).
What is the lead level in Frusi Water Treatment Plant water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Frusi Water Treatment Plant is 1.2 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2023. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for KS2006114: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID KS2006114).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- The utility's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report): ask Frusi Water Treatment Plant at (785) 802-7018, or see EPA's guide to finding it.
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.