Tap Water Results

Is Topeka, KS tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Topeka · serves 125,963 people (55,755 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID KS2017701

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Topeka gets its water from City of Topeka. Parts of the city are served by 4 smaller systems: Shawnee County Rural Water District 4C (12,000 people), Shawnee County Rural Water District 3C (2,960 people), Shawnee County Rural Water District 2C (700 people), Metro Topeka Airport Authority (500 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 18.2 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.4 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jan 2018.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Feb 2025 to Nov 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.28 ppt5.1 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 4 samples. Highest result 18.2 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.4 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2.5 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)1.4 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20232.4 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20202 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20172.5 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20141.3 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20112.8 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20102.3 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20074.1 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20044.9 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19994.4 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19965.7 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 19955.6 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
5
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2018The running annual average for Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) was above the legal limit.
EPA record: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.061 mg/l (limit 0.060 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Chlorate28 ppb210 ppb1 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.12 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.53 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium6.5 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum4.2 ppb40 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Topeka

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 66409, 66546, 66603, 66604, 66605, 66606, 66607, 66608, 66609, 66610, 66611, 66612, 66614, 66615, 66616, 66617, 66618, 66619, 66621, 66622

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Topeka tap water safe to drink?

Most of Topeka gets its water from City of Topeka. City of Topeka had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Topeka water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Topeka found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Topeka water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Topeka is 1.4 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.