Tap Water Results

Crofton-Odenton Water System water quality

Odenton, MD · serves 62,986 people (22,070 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID MD0020008

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No limits exceeded in the data EPA has, but the record is incomplete: no lead results since 2019.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 2 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
Out of dateEPA's national database has no lead results for this system since 2019 (then 0 ppb, 90th percentile). Systems this size normally test every one to three years, so this most likely means newer results were not reported to EPA, not that testing stopped. Ask the utility for its latest results.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Jun 2024 to Nov 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 1 of 2 samples. Highest result 9.06 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Below screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2017 – Dec 2019). No results since 2019

This is the newest lead result in EPA's national database. Utilities report lead results to their state, and states pass them to EPA. Gaps like this usually mean the newer results did not reach EPA's database, not that the utility stopped testing. Results this old may not reflect the water today. Ask the utility or your state drinking water program for the latest lead monitoring.

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 2016-5 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20131 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20070 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20040 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 20010 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19985 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 19955 ppb
Jan 1994 – Dec 19940 ppb
Jan 1993 – Dec 19930 ppb
Jul 1992 – Dec 19920 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
7
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese1.43 ppb300 ppb2 of 2UCMR 4 (2018)
Strontium0.034 ppm1.5 ppm4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium0.39 ppb21 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-60.043 ppb–3 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate590 ppb210 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Odenton, Crofton, Severna Park

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 21108, 21113, 21114

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Crofton-Odenton Water System water safe to drink?

Crofton-Odenton Water System has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Crofton-Odenton Water System water have PFAS?

EPA tested Crofton-Odenton Water System for 29 PFAS between Jun 2024 and Nov 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Crofton-Odenton Water System water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Crofton-Odenton Water System is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2019, which is more than five years old. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.