Tap Water Results

City of Rockville water quality

Rockville, MD · serves 52,000 people (17,500 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID MD0150003

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No limits exceeded in the data EPA has, but the record is incomplete: no lead results since 2018.

PFAS
Detected, below limit4 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Out of dateEPA's national database has no lead results for this system since 2018 (then 0 ppb, 90th percentile). Systems this size normally test every one to three years, so this most likely means newer results were not reported to EPA, not that testing stopped. Ask the utility for its latest results.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Mar 2023 to Dec 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.000450.00181Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
0.9 ppt3.6 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.3 ppt5.2 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
2.82 ppt5.8 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
4.1 ppt6.5 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 4 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2018 – Jun 2018). No results since 2018

This is the newest lead result in EPA's national database. Utilities report lead results to their state, and states pass them to EPA. Gaps like this usually mean the newer results did not reach EPA's database, not that the utility stopped testing. Results this old may not reflect the water today. Ask the utility or your state drinking water program for the latest lead monitoring.

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2018 – Jun 20180 ppb
Jul 2017 – Dec 2017-2 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 2017-2 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 2016-5 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20130 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20103 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20073 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20022 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 20012 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19966 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 19950 ppb
Jan 1994 – Dec 19940 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
16
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
89
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese10.8 ppb300 ppb3 of 3UCMR 4 (2020)
1,4-Dioxane0.071 ppb0.35 ppb1 of 4UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.13 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.25 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate87.7 ppb210 ppb7 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum1.2 ppb40 ppb2 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.66 ppb21 ppb6 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Rockville

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 20850, 20851, 20852, 20854

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is City of Rockville water safe to drink?

City of Rockville has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does City of Rockville water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Rockville found 4 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in City of Rockville water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Rockville is 0 ppb, for the period ending Jun 2018, which is more than five years old. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.