Hastings Water System water quality
Hastings, MN · serves 23,222 people (7,612 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID MN1190012
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Summary
PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.
Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.
- PFAS
- Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 21.1 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 4.55 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
- Lead
- Below action level3 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Oct 2021. 2 required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Oct 2021. What to do if you get a notice.
- Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Nitrate is most harmful to babies under 6 months, and boiling concentrates it. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
- To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Got a boil-water or do-not-drink notice? What each notice means and what to do.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read Hastings Water System's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (651) 480-2350. EPA: how to find it.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 5 entry points tested Nov 2024 to Oct 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 21.1 ppt 5.26× the limit |
| PFOS Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 4.55 ppt 1.14× the limit |
| PFHxS Detected, below limit Limit 10 ppt | 1.7 ppt 17% of the limit |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Detected, below limit Limit 1 | 0.17 |
| PFBS Detected, below limit Guideline 2,000 ppt | 1.65 ppt |
| PFBA Detected, below limit Guideline 6,000 ppt | 239 ppt |
| PFHxA Detected, below limit Guideline 3,000 ppt | 7.6 ppt |
| PFPeA Detected, no limit | 17.4 ppt |
For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 99% of the Minnesota systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 95% of the Minnesota systems EPA tested.
29 PFAS tested, 7 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Not detected in 10 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 3 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level
Highest since 2016: 6 ppb (Jun 2019).
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jan 2022 – Dec 2024 | 3 ppb |
| Jan 2021 – Dec 2021 | 3 ppb |
| Jan 2020 – Dec 2020 | 3 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jul 2019 – Dec 2019 | 4 ppb |
| Jan 2019 – Jun 2019 | 6 ppb |
| Jan 2014 – Dec 2016 | 3 ppb |
| Jan 2011 – Dec 2013 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2008 – Dec 2010 | 6 ppb |
| Jan 2005 – Dec 2007 | 4 ppb |
| Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 | 4 ppb |
| Jan 1999 – Dec 2001 | 7 ppb |
| Jan 1996 – Dec 1998 | 6 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
| When | What happened |
|---|---|
| Oct 2021 | The running annual average for Nitrate was above the legal limit. Urgent public notice required What that means EPA record: Nitrate · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 11.5 mg/l (limit 10 mg/L) Resolved |
| Sep 2018 | E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste. Urgent public notice required What that means EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR) Resolved |
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)
| Contaminant | Highest | Guideline |
|---|---|---|
| Manganese | 19.3 ppb | 300 ppb |
| Molybdenum | 2.2 ppb | 40 ppb |
| Chromium-6 | 0.61 ppb | – |
| Strontium | 0.1 ppm | 1.5 ppm |
Where it serves
Hastings
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 55033
Nearby utilities
- Newport Water System Newport · 12 mi · PFAS above limit
- Woodbury Water System Woodbury · 13 mi · PFAS above limit
- Eagan Water System Eagan · 16 mi
- Apple Valley Water System Apple Valley · 17 mi
- Lake Elmo Water System Lake Elmo · 18 mi · PFAS above limit
- Saint Paul Regional Water Services St. Paul · 19 mi
Questions
Is Hastings Water System water safe to drink?
Hastings Water System had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does Hastings Water System water have PFAS?
Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Hastings Water System found 7 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 21.1 ppt, PFOS 4.55 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).
What is the lead level in Hastings Water System water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Hastings Water System is 3 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for MN1190012: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID MN1190012).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- The utility's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report): ask Hastings Water System at (651) 480-2350, or see EPA's guide to finding it.
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.