Tap Water Results

Is Springfield, MO tap water safe?

Supplied by City Utilities of Springfield · serves 210,898 people (87,809 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID MO5010754

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Springfield gets its water from City Utilities of Springfield. Parts of the city are served by 9 smaller systems: James River Addition Water System (240 people), Colony Cove MHP (210 people), Country Squire Village Water System (90 people), Shady Oak MHP (65 people) and 5 more. Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level5.1 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 3 entry points tested Mar 2024 to Dec 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
1.07 ppt
27% of the limit
4.3 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.000380.00151Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
0.75 ppt3 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 1 of 10 samples. Highest result 10.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Below screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 5.1 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 8.2 ppb (Dec 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20255.1 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20223.9 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20224.9 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2022 – Jun 20224.9 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20198.2 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 20165.3 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20135.3 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20102.1 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20074 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20045.1 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20036 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20024.6 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
2
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.53 ppb300 ppb1 of 8UCMR 4 (2019)
Strontium0.068 ppm1.5 ppm16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.43 ppb21 ppb7 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.18 ppb–15 of 16UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate590 ppb210 ppb9 of 14UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Springfield

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 65619, 65721, 65738, 65742, 65757, 65765, 65781, 65801, 65802, 65803, 65804, 65805, 65806, 65807, 65808, 65809, 65810

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Springfield tap water safe to drink?

Most of Springfield gets its water from City Utilities of Springfield. City Utilities of Springfield has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Springfield water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City Utilities of Springfield found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Springfield water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City Utilities of Springfield is 5.1 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.