Tap Water Results

Is Odessa, TX tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Odessa · serves 123,334 people (55,910 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID TX0680002

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit3 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 48 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Feb 2021. 2 required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Feb 2021. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Aug 2024 to Jun 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
4.53 ppt
45% of the limit
4.9 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.450.491Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
3.85 ppt4.5 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.35 ppt5.4 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 3 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 4 samples. Highest result 48 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 10.1 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20210 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 202010.1 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20172.78 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 20142.55 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20123.15 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20092.74 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20064.1 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20033.5 ppb
Jan 1998 – Dec 20001.5 ppb
Jan 1997 – Dec 19971.6 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19961.7 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
8
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now (plus 1 paperwork)
22
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Oct 2019 – Feb 2021
2 times
The water was too cloudy too often in a month. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved

1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Public Notice.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese12.3 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2019)
Chromium-60.12 ppb–4 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium2.7 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum11 ppb40 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium14 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate21 ppb210 ppb1 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Odessa

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 79707, 79760, 79761, 79762, 79763, 79764, 79765, 79766

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Odessa tap water safe to drink?

Most of Odessa gets its water from City of Odessa. City of Odessa had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Odessa water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Odessa found 3 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Odessa water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Odessa is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.