Tap Water Results

Is Lake Havasu City, AZ tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Lake Havasu · serves 54,610 people (29,600 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID AZ0408022

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Lake Havasu City gets its water from City of Lake Havasu. Parts of the city are served by 3 smaller systems: EPCOR – Lake Havasu (4,712 people), Havasu Heights Dwid Water System (599 people), Horizon Six Dwid Water System (560 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 100 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level3.1 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2023. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Mar 2025 to Sep 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.000750.00151Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
1.5 ppt3 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 2 of 2 samples. Highest result 100 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3.1 ppb lead (Jan 2021 – Dec 2023). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 4.4 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2021 – Dec 20233.1 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20204.2 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20174.4 ppb
Earlier results (8)
Jan 2012 – Dec 20147.4 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20116.72 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20105.6 ppb
Jul 2007 – Dec 20077.8 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20077.9 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20048 ppb
Jan 1993 – Jun 19936 ppb
Jul 1992 – Dec 19925 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
12
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
296
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese5.2 ppb300 ppb2 of 2UCMR 4 (2019)
Chromium-61.5 ppb–4 of 4UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium0.94 ppb21 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium1.4 ppm1.5 ppm4 of 4UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum6.7 ppb40 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane0.086 ppb0.35 ppb2 of 2UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Lake Havasu City

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 86403, 86404, 86405, 86406

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Lake Havasu City tap water safe to drink?

Most of Lake Havasu City gets its water from City of Lake Havasu. City of Lake Havasu has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Lake Havasu City water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Lake Havasu found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Lake Havasu City water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Lake Havasu is 3.1 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2023. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.