Tap Water Results

Is Burbank, CA tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Burbank Water Dept. · serves 106,146 people (25,923 connections) · Purchased surface water · EPA ID CA1910179

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Metropolitan Water District of SO. Cal., City of Glendale Water Dept.. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit3 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level0.86 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested May 2024 to Feb 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
7.2 ppt8.1 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
3 ppt4.4 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
8.15 ppt10.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 3 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0.86 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2.1 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0.86 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20202.1 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20171.2 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20140 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20110 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20080 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20024 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20004 ppb
Jul 1992 – Dec 19927 ppb
Jan 1992 – Dec 19927 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
4
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
7
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.83 ppb300 ppb1 of 4UCMR 4 (2019)
Strontium0.96 ppm1.5 ppm10 of 10UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium10 ppb21 ppb10 of 10UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate130 ppb210 ppb10 of 10UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane1 ppb0.35 ppb4 of 6UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-68.1 ppb–10 of 10UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum13 ppb40 ppb10 of 10UCMR 3 (2015)
Cobalt1.4 ppb70 ppb1 of 10UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Burbank

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 91501, 91502, 91503, 91504, 91505, 91506

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Burbank tap water safe to drink?

Most of Burbank gets its water from City of Burbank Water Dept.. City of Burbank Water Dept. has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Burbank water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Burbank Water Dept. found 3 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Burbank water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Burbank Water Dept. is 0.86 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.