Tap Water Results

Is Dodge City, KS tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Dodge City · serves 27,104 people (9,881 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID KS2005710

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOS 6.7 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 166 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jan 2023. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Jan 2023. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 15 entry points tested Mar 2024 to May 2026. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
6.7 ppt
1.68× the limit
6.8 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
3.5 ppt3.7 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOS average is higher than at 98% of the Kansas systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 30 of 30 samples. Highest result 166 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2.8 ppb (Dec 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20250 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20221.9 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20192.8 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20161.6 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20131.4 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20101.7 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20071.9 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20002.4 ppb
Jan 1997 – Dec 19974.2 ppb
Jan 1994 – Dec 19944 ppb
Jan 1993 – Jun 19932 ppb
Jul 1992 – Dec 19923 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
3
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
50
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2023The running annual average for Nitrate was above the legal limit.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Nitrate · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 11 mg/l (limit 10 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese300 ppb300 ppb8 of 30UCMR 4 (2019)
Vanadium17.1 ppb21 ppb16 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum4.7 ppb40 ppb16 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-61 ppb–16 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium2.05 ppm1.5 ppm16 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Dodge City

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 67801

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Dodge City tap water safe to drink?

Most of Dodge City gets its water from City of Dodge City. City of Dodge City had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Dodge City water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Dodge City found 2 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOS: PFOS 6.7 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Dodge City water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Dodge City is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.