Tap Water Results

Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative water quality

Sandwich, MA · serves 56,250 people (6 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID MA4261024

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 6 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
No resultsNo lead and copper results in EPA's national database.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 3 entry points tested Dec 2024 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 6 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

No lead and copper results reported to EPA's national database for this system.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
22
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.46 ppb300 ppb1 of 6UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium0.032 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.29 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Sandwich

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 02532, 02534, 02536, 02537, 02540, 02542, 02543, 02553, 02556, 02559, 02561, 02563, 02574, 02644, 02649

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative water safe to drink?

Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative water have PFAS?

EPA tested Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative for 29 PFAS between Dec 2024 and Dec 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.