Tap Water Results

Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. water quality

Wareham, MA · serves 5,392 people (2,982 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID MA4310003

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOS 6.15 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lead
Below action level3 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2023. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently May 2019. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently May 2019. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 4 entry points tested Jun 2025 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
6.15 ppt
1.54× the limit
7.1 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

For context: the PFOS average is higher than at 90% of the Massachusetts systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 8 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3 ppb lead (Jan 2021 – Dec 2023). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 10 ppb (Dec 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2021 – Dec 20233 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20203 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 201910 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20162 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20132 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20104 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20063 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20034 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20023 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20013 ppb
Jul 1996 – Jun 19975 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 199515 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
24
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
47
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
May 2019E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese61.4 ppb300 ppb8 of 8UCMR 4 (2019)
Vanadium1 ppb21 ppb5 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate55 ppb210 ppb14 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.19 ppb–16 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.061 ppm1.5 ppm16 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Wareham

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 02532, 02538, 02558, 02571

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. water safe to drink?

Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. found 1 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOS: PFOS 6.15 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Onset Fire Districtwater Dept. is 3 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2023. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.