Tap Water Results

Waterford Township water quality

Waterford charter, MI · serves 73,441 people (24,601 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID MI0006910

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level1 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jan 2023.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 12 entry points tested Mar 2023 to Sep 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
3.25 ppt
32% of the limit
6.5 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.330.651Detected, below limit
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

Michigan has its own PFAS limits. PFNA 6 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOA 8 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFHxA 400000 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOS 16 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFHxS 51 ppt (this system's highest average: 3.25 ppt), PFBS 420 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), HFPO-DA 370 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 11 of 24 samples. Highest result 13.6 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Below screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 3 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – now (in progress)1 ppb
Jan 2025 – Dec 20251 ppb
Jul 2024 – Dec 20242 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2024 – Jun 20241 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20231 ppb
Jan 2023 – Dec 20231.5 ppb
Jan 2022 – Dec 20220 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20211 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20201.2 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20192.9 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20173 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20144.8 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
7
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2023The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese26 ppb300 ppb19 of 24UCMR 4 (2018)
Cobalt2.1 ppb70 ppb1 of 46UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum13 ppb40 ppb46 of 46UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.7 ppm1.5 ppm46 of 46UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.03 ppb–1 of 46UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.09 ppb0.35 ppb1 of 24UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Waterford charter, Redford charter

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 48239, 48327, 48328, 48329

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Waterford Township water safe to drink?

Waterford Township had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Waterford Township water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Waterford Township found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Waterford Township water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Waterford Township is 1 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.