Tap Water Results

Is Cranberry, PA tap water safe?

Supplied by West View Water Authority · serves 200,000 people (58,562 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID PA5020043

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Cranberry gets its water from West View Water Authority. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Municipal Water Auth Adams Township (8,700 people). Your water bill names your system.

Buys water from Robinson Township Municipal Authority, Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 8 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Sep 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Aug 2018.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Sep 2024 to Jun 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

Pennsylvania has its own PFAS limits. PFOA 14 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOS 18 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 8 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jun 2025 – Sep 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 11.6 ppb (Sep 2016).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jun 2025 – Sep 20250 ppb
Jun 2022 – Sep 20224.31 ppb
Jun 2019 – Sep 20195.63 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jun 2016 – Sep 201611.6 ppb
Jun 2013 – Sep 20138.4 ppb
Jan 2013 – Jun 20130 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 201211 ppb
Jan 2011 – Jun 20114.5 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 201029.6 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20073.2 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20041 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20011.6 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
13
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
81
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Apr 2018 – Aug 2018
2 times
A required step to remove or kill germs (filtration, disinfection or fixing a contaminated well) was not done properly.
EPA record: Surface Water Treatment Rule · Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese1.62 ppb300 ppb3 of 3UCMR 4 (2019)
Molybdenum1.3 ppb40 ppb2 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.1 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.19 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Cranberry, Adams, Economy, Pine, Marshall, Robinson, Richland, Ross, Allison Park, Franklin Park, Shaler, Harmony, Neville, Bellevue, Bradford Woods

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 15003, 15005, 15015, 15044, 15086, 15090, 15101, 15116, 15136, 15143, 15202, 15204, 15205, 15209, 15212, 15214, 15220, 15225, 15229, 15233, 15237, 16046, 16066

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Cranberry tap water safe to drink?

Most of Cranberry gets its water from West View Water Authority. West View Water Authority had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Cranberry water have PFAS?

EPA tested West View Water Authority for 29 PFAS between Sep 2024 and Jun 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Cranberry water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for West View Water Authority is 0 ppb, for the period ending Sep 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.