Tap Water Results

City of Lancaster water quality

Lancaster, PA · serves 120,000 people (49,376 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID PA7360058

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 14.7 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lead
Below action level7 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Sep 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Apr 2024.
What you can do
  • Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
  • To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
  • Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
  • Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
  • Read City of Lancaster's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (717) 291-4738. EPA: how to find it.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Dec 2023 to Sep 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
14.7 ppt
3.66× the limit
23.8 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.00310.00491Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
6.28 ppt9.8 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
8.88 ppt15.4 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
16.7 ppt28.8 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
12.7 ppt22.3 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
5.07 ppt8.1 pptnoneDetected, no limit

What the utility says it is doing: In a 2026 customer letter after a July 2026 Conestoga plant PFOA result raised its running average to 15.2 ng/L, the city says its most likely solution is sourcing water solely from the Susquehanna River, at an estimated cost of about $90 million.

Source: City of Lancaster letter and PA DEP Tier 2 public notice: PFOA MCL exceedance (hosted by Penn Township), 2026-08. Collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not from EPA's data. Ask the utility for the latest.

Pennsylvania has its own PFAS limits. PFOA 14 ppt (this system's highest average: 14.7 ppt, above it), PFOS 18 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 97% of the Pennsylvania systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 6 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 8 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 7 ppb lead (Jun 2025 – Sep 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 9.9 ppb (Sep 2022).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jun 2025 – Sep 20257 ppb
Jun 2022 – Sep 20229.9 ppb
Jun 2019 – Sep 20195.7 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jun 2016 – Sep 20166 ppb
Jun 2013 – Sep 20134.5 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20104.8 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20073.49 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20047.6 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20017 ppb
Jul 2000 – Dec 20002 ppb
Jan 1999 – Jun 19998.2 ppb
Jan 1998 – Dec 199813 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
75
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Apr 2024The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.083 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved
Oct 2016The running annual average for Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) was above the legal limit.
EPA record: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average (limit 0.060 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese34.1 ppb300 ppb8 of 8UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-60.34 ppb–16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum1.3 ppb40 ppb1 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium1.1 ppb21 ppb10 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate376 ppb210 ppb16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.23 ppm1.5 ppm16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.07 ppb0.35 ppb1 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Lancaster

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 17505, 17512, 17520, 17540, 17543, 17545, 17551, 17554, 17572, 17576, 17584, 17601, 17602, 17603

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is City of Lancaster water safe to drink?

City of Lancaster had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does City of Lancaster water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Lancaster found 6 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA: PFOA 14.7 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in City of Lancaster water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Lancaster is 7 ppb, for the period ending Sep 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.