Tap Water Results

Is Pawtucket, RI tap water safe?

Supplied by Pawtucket Water Supply Board Veolia-Na · serves 98,130 people (23,559 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID RI1592021

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Mar 2023 to Dec 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
6:2 FTS
Detected, no limit
1.5 ppt6 pptnoneDetected, no limit

Rhode Island has its own PFAS limits. the sum of PFOA + PFOS + PFHxS + PFNA + PFHpA + PFDA must stay at or below 20 ppt (this system's highest averages add up to 0 ppt). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2 ppb (Dec 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2023 – Dec 20251.3 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20220 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2017 – Dec 20192 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 20162 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20133 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20101 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20076 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20055.5 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20025 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20017 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20005 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
13
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese43.7 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2019)
Chromium-60.16 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate450 ppb210 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.085 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium1 ppb21 ppb7 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Pawtucket, Cumberland, Central Falls

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 02860, 02861, 02862, 02863, 02864

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Pawtucket tap water safe to drink?

Most of Pawtucket gets its water from Pawtucket Water Supply Board Veolia-Na. Pawtucket Water Supply Board Veolia-Na has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Pawtucket water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Pawtucket Water Supply Board Veolia-Na found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Pawtucket water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Pawtucket Water Supply Board Veolia-Na is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.