Tap Water Results

Is Providence, RI tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Providence · serves 333,142 people (79,554 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID RI1592024

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Providence gets its water from City of Providence. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Bethany Home of Rhode Island Water System (83 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 4 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
Below action level1.7 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jul 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jul 2018.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Jan 2024 to Oct 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

Rhode Island has its own PFAS limits. the sum of PFOA + PFOS + PFHxS + PFNA + PFHpA + PFDA must stay at or below 20 ppt (this system's highest averages add up to 0 ppt). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.7 ppb lead (Jul 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 22 ppb (Dec 2018).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jul 2026 – now (in progress)1.7 ppb
Jan 2026 – Jun 20261.6 ppb
Jul 2025 – Dec 20251.6 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2025 – Jun 20251.6 ppb
Jul 2024 – Dec 20243 ppb
Jan 2024 – Jun 20242.2 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20232.2 ppb
Jan 2023 – Jun 20233.4 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20223.3 ppb
Jan 2022 – Jun 20225.6 ppb
Jul 2021 – Dec 202110.5 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20218.8 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
5
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
11
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jul 2018The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.082 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese1.31 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2019)
Vanadium0.42 ppb21 ppb6 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.028 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.031 ppb–1 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Providence, Cranston, Johnston, North Providence

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 02857, 02860, 02865, 02893, 02903, 02904, 02905, 02906, 02907, 02908, 02909, 02910, 02911, 02912, 02917, 02919, 02920, 02921

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Providence tap water safe to drink?

Most of Providence gets its water from City of Providence. City of Providence had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Providence water have PFAS?

EPA tested City of Providence for 29 PFAS between Jan 2024 and Oct 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Providence water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Providence is 1.7 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jul 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.