Tap Water Results

Jericho Water District water quality

Oyster Bay, NY · serves 58,000 people (18,466 connections) · Groundwater · Public/private · EPA ID NY2902831

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit5 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level2 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jul 2023.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 20 entry points tested Apr 2023 to Nov 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
56 ppt67 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
16 ppt18 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
34 ppt37 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
4.2 ppt4.6 pptnoneDetected, no limit
6:2 FTS
Detected, no limit
4.95 ppt9.9 pptnoneDetected, no limit

New York has its own PFAS limits. PFOA 10 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOS 10 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 5 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 40 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 2 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 5 ppb (Jun 2024).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – now (in progress)2 ppb
Jul 2025 – Dec 20250 ppb
Jan 2025 – Jun 20252 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2024 – Dec 20242.6 ppb
Jan 2024 – Jun 20245 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20231.2 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20221.4 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20191 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 20161 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20132.09 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20101 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20071 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
98
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jul 2023The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese32.5 ppb300 ppb26 of 37UCMR 4 (2020)
Vanadium0.38 ppb21 ppb1 of 50UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate237 ppb210 ppb28 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane3.5 ppb0.35 ppb25 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.077 ppm1.5 ppm50 of 50UCMR 3 (2015)
Cobalt14.1 ppb70 ppb6 of 50UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-61.3 ppb–43 of 50UCMR 3 (2015)
1,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP)0.25 ppb0.0004 ppb3 of 37UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Oyster Bay

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 11791, 11797

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Jericho Water District water safe to drink?

Jericho Water District had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Jericho Water District water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Jericho Water District found 5 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Jericho Water District water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Jericho Water District is 2 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.