Tap Water Results

Is Erie, PA tap water safe?

Supplied by Erie City Water Authority · serves 220,001 people (63,820 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID PA6250028

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 8 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
Below action level1.08 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Sep 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Oct 2018. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Oct 2018. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Jan 2023 to Oct 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

Pennsylvania has its own PFAS limits. PFOA 14 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOS 18 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 8 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.08 ppb lead (Jun 2025 – Sep 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1.18 ppb (Sep 2016).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jun 2025 – Sep 20251.08 ppb
Jun 2022 – Sep 20221.08 ppb
Jun 2019 – Sep 20190 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jun 2016 – Sep 20161.18 ppb
Jun 2013 – Sep 20130 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20103.2 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20070.48 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20033 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20012 ppb
Jul 1998 – Dec 19982 ppb
Jul 1997 – Dec 19976 ppb
Jul 1992 – Dec 19924 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
20
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
200
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Oct 2018The water was cloudier than allowed at least once. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Single Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved
Jan 2017The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese3.17 ppb300 ppb5 of 6UCMR 4 (2020)
Chlorate230 ppb210 ppb8 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.11 ppb–12 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.21 ppm1.5 ppm12 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum1.5 ppb40 ppb11 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium0.26 ppb21 ppb3 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Erie

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 16415, 16421, 16428, 16501, 16502, 16503, 16504, 16505, 16506, 16507, 16508, 16509, 16510, 16511, 16512, 16541, 16563

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Erie tap water safe to drink?

Most of Erie gets its water from Erie City Water Authority. Erie City Water Authority had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Erie water have PFAS?

EPA tested Erie City Water Authority for 29 PFAS between Jan 2023 and Oct 2023 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Erie water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Erie City Water Authority is 1.08 ppb, for the period ending Sep 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.